Kierre aloitti El Jevi

Well, here we have a trouble. There are three different topics for the 'same' thing:
- Sikorsky S-55
- Sikorsky H-19 Chickasaw
- Westland Whirlwind (helicopter)
And we have the same trouble for most of Sikorsky products, listed in the topics either under the company's own (S-xx) or US military (CH-xx, SH-xx, ...) designations.
This is not a trouble for those modellers with the knowledge about this matter, but anyone without it will miss many products in the database, so I think it will be better to merge all Sikorsky models under the company's designation.
What do you think about it?
6 June 2012, 10:00

I know, but many products can be combined.
What do you prefer for building a Whirlwind? The almost-50 years old Airfix kit or modify the almost 'state of the art' Italeri UH-19?
6 June 2012, 11:05

Merging is great unless it leads to mixing up very different molds in one manufactruer in one line. E.g. it would have been a bad idea to merge AV-8As and AV-8Bs under one Harrier label. Mixing Harriers and Sea Harriers works quite well though.
No objections to merging S-55/H-19/Whirlwind/HO3S under S-55
Likewise CH-54/S-64
Likewise H-3/Comando/Seaking/HSS under S-61
How can we make sure that any search using "HO3S" or "H-19" as an input will point at "Sikorsky S-55"
Apart from that a few knowledgable moderators can clean up the place pretty quickly in case someone got lost with the disginators 🙂
6 June 2012, 13:49

We can't be sure, but any just looking for HO3S may miss a lot of information, if he find nothing in that way MAYBE will be interested in making some research and will find the right path.
6 June 2012, 14:09

Right. So let's go and merge to S-51, S-55, S-58, S-61, S-64, S-70...anything else?
6 June 2012, 15:32

also, when you search for HO3S you do get results...you can always click on the header in search results, which will find all related articles.
7 June 2012, 04:43

so when searching for HO3S you get 2 results, but you will see it belongs to "Sikorsky S-51 Dragonfly", clicking on that one will trigger a new search...
7 June 2012, 04:45

Can we split the CH-53 into Sikorsky S-65 (two engines) and S-80 (three engines) then?
7 June 2012, 05:44