Pz.Kpfw.VI Ausf C/B (VK36.01)
2 in 1 w/ interior
REVOSYS | No RS-3001 | 1:35

Факти
- Марка:
- REVOSYS
- Наименование:
- Pz.Kpfw.VI Ausf C/B (VK36.01) 2 in 1 w/ interior
- Номер:
- RS-3001
- Мащаб:
- 1:35
- Тип:
- Пълен комплект
- В продажба:
- 2017 Нова матрица
- Баркод:
- 4897083250011 (EAN)
- Тема:
- VK 3601 » Танкове (Превозни средства)
Съдържание на кутията
Литник, Фотоец, Воден декал
Размери:
380x240x90 mm
(15x9.4x3.5 inch)
Тегло:
890 g (1.96 lbs)
Хронология на продукта
REVOSYS
Rye Field Model
Инструкции
Изтегли 12024Kb (.pdf)
Пазар
Онлайн магазини

AUD 91.50


€ 56.90


¥ 7120


zł 217.56

Частна търговия и размяна
Алтернативни SKU за REVOSYS RS-3001:
RS3001 | 3001
Забележка: Цените и наличността са индикативни. Проверете дали продуктът действително съвпада!
Свързани продукти
Преглед на съдържанието
Външни прегледи
Реклама
Всички отзиви » (10 общо)
Списания
Всички списания » (4 общо)
Коментари

I love this kit. Full of details. Lucky enough to buy 5 of them before all the sellers jacked up the prices so high. Got them for 54.99 each and free shipping. Plan on building all the different versions. Why did DRAGON/DML give up on this kit?
1 6 October 2018, 06:34

Well, thankfully scale models don't have to abide by what was existed and what didn't. We can have whatever what-ifs we want.
6 April 2024, 22:28

Perhaps, but this vehicle did exist. The hull was tested as shown, the turret was made but never mounted; the gun is the only "fictional" part, though the project for a squeeze bore 75/55mm gun was very real - it just never went anywhere, someone must have realized it was all looking quite expensive.
7 April 2024, 14:15

Expensive to make and operate, yes. Expensive to shoot? Not at all, it used the same ammunition as the Flak 36.
The squeeze-bore cannon that was supposed to go on the VK 36 01H required ~1kg of tungsten per shot, a material that was perpetually in very short supply. If not for that and the excessive barrel wear, they just might have fielded one of these.
10 April 2024, 21:15

That is what I said about the Tiger 1, yes. Still cheaper than a tank for which ammo production would have been impossible.
11 April 2024, 02:11