Tamiya 1:35 Stug IV

I wanted to see if this 1976 kit could still make a presentable model when there are many newer kits available now. Opinions vary but I think it's better than the Italeri model of similar vintage. You can easily pick one up for well under £20.
For me, the Tamiya kit's worst accuracy faults are the skinny roadwheels, slightly off vertical rear plate on the fighting compartment, missing fuel filler caps on the lower hull and the hideously thick schurzen mountings and rails. The tools are poor as well. Most early Stug IVs had the cast idler wheel, so I added a pair taken from a Tamiya Panzer IV Ausf J kit which contains both cast and welded types.  

All the tools were replaced with the much newer and better Tamiya Panzer IV on vehicle equipment set. Zimmerit is also mandatory for an early Stug IV. Mr Surfacer on the mantlet gives a bit more texture. Solid plastic grab handles replaced with bent metal or rod. The interior through the commander and loaders hatches is very dark but wouldn't be unless I had installed a firewall between the engine bay and fighting compartment and sheeted over the open undersides of the superstructure above the tracks - that horrible feature of most Tamiya tank models until recently. 

Copper tow cable and resin cable ends. Thinned out schurzen brackets with plastic strip strengthening bars and Grandt Line bolts. Small bits from the Eduard photoetch set. Home made schurzen spacers on mudguard edges using brass strip. I must have knocked the commander's
cupola out of place during the photos - it isn't yet fixed in position. 

Jack block location on Stug IVs seems to have mystified many kit manufacturers but the normal position is here on the starboard track guard. Stug IVs also had a sheet metal strip at the bottom of the fighting compartment sides, secured by five bolts. The MG shield also benefits from being thinned down a bit. 

The kit lacks the correct lifting hooks on either side of the front plate. I used TRex 3D printed replacements. 

Bosch headlight and spare track links both from the Tamiya Panzer IV on vehicle equipment set and light cable added. I rather like how Tamiya represented the texture of the add on concrete armour in front of the drivers position. In case anyone cares, the Zimmerit was done using Deluxe Materials Perfect Plastic Putty and a Tamiya Zim tool. 

The amount of thinning applied to the schurzen brackets was huge, but worth it and the plastic strip insert makes them reasonably strong. Took a while to do though. 

I added some etched brass strip for the two brackets supporting the spare wheel rack, filled the incorrectly positioned rear schurzen bracket locating holes, but left them off for the time being until I have some paint down. The aerial mount on the left side is missing its covering plates so these were added from scrap plastic. Stowage box had a latch added from the Eduard set. 

Eduard's etch bits enhance the MG shield and loader's hatches, after the ejection marks have been filled and sanded smooth. 

More ejector pin marks on the rear mudflap inside need dealing with. I also added a cover plate on the left of the exhaust to cover the hole left by the deletion of the removed auxiliary generator exhaust. 

These two pages in the August 1976 issue of Military Modelling Magazine featured the work of someone almost no-one knew then. All the kits were well known to any AFV modeller - all from Tamiya except the US truck from Max. I'd never seen anyone present these kits in such well composed and beautiful ways. I was in awe and it wasn't long before the mighty Tamiya noticed him too... 

Within a year or two, Tamiya were routinely devoting two pages in their kit catalogue to Francois Verlinden's renditions of their kits. Here's his take on the Tamiya Stug IV. This inspired me to make the same kit today in my own way, but still paying respect to this original inspiration from almost 50 years ago. My cover version of a classic if you like.
In 1976 no-one knew or cared that all early Stug IVs had Zimmerit. Or that panzer grey let alone this light grey was the wrong colour. Forget all that though, this and almost all his early work show a mastery of light and shade, composition, and balance whereby the whole scene enagages the eye and leads the viewer in exactly the same way as the paintings of old masters.