Pz.Kpfw.VI Ausf C/B (VK36.01)
2 in 1 w/ interior
REVOSYS | № RS-3001 | 1:35

Факти
- Бренд:
- REVOSYS
- Заголовок:
- Pz.Kpfw.VI Ausf C/B (VK36.01) 2 in 1 w/ interior
- Номер:
- RS-3001
- Масштаб:
- 1:35
- Тип:
- Повний набір
- Випущений:
- 2017 Нова прес-форма
- Штрих-код:
- 4897083250011 (EAN)
- Тема:
- VK 3601 » Танки (Транспортні засоби)
Вміст коробки
Пластмасова відливка, Фототравлення, Деколь (перевідна)
Розміри:
380x240x90 mm
(15x9.4x3.5 inch)
Вага:
890 g (1.96 lbs)
Графік продукту
REVOSYS
Rye Field Model
Інструкції
Завантажити 12024Kb (.pdf)
Ринок
Інтернет-магазини

AUD 91.50


€ 56.90


¥ 7120


zł 217.56

Приватна торгівля та обмін
Альтернативні SKU для REVOSYS RS-3001:
RS3001 | 3001
Примітка: Ціни та наявність орієнтовні. Також перевірте, чи справді товар відповідає опису!
Супутні товари

WWII German Pz.Kpfw.VI Ausf.C/B VK36.01 Fenders REVOSYS
Voyager Model 1:35
PE35907 2018 Нова прес-форма Огляди "в коробці"
Зовнішні огляди
Реклама
Всі відгуки » (10 загалом)
Журнали
Всі журнали » (4 загалом)
Коментарі

I love this kit. Full of details. Lucky enough to buy 5 of them before all the sellers jacked up the prices so high. Got them for 54.99 each and free shipping. Plan on building all the different versions. Why did DRAGON/DML give up on this kit?
1 6 October 2018, 06:34

Well, thankfully scale models don't have to abide by what was existed and what didn't. We can have whatever what-ifs we want.
6 April 2024, 22:28

Perhaps, but this vehicle did exist. The hull was tested as shown, the turret was made but never mounted; the gun is the only "fictional" part, though the project for a squeeze bore 75/55mm gun was very real - it just never went anywhere, someone must have realized it was all looking quite expensive.
7 April 2024, 14:15

Expensive to make and operate, yes. Expensive to shoot? Not at all, it used the same ammunition as the Flak 36.
The squeeze-bore cannon that was supposed to go on the VK 36 01H required ~1kg of tungsten per shot, a material that was perpetually in very short supply. If not for that and the excessive barrel wear, they just might have fielded one of these.
10 April 2024, 21:15

That is what I said about the Tiger 1, yes. Still cheaper than a tank for which ammo production would have been impossible.
11 April 2024, 02:11