Тему розпочав користувач gorby

додав новий фотоальбом.
47 зображення
YOU CANNOT BE SERIOUS!!! - Un-classic Box Art
Tashigrushka – Curtiss P-40 Warhawk (so I’m led to believe) – WHAT THE HELL IS THAT!!!!!
24 12 October 2024, 14:15

Nice collection of WTF box arts 🙂. To be fair, majority of them are from the ancient era (60's/70's/80's) of modelling, nobody focused that much on what's on the box back then (but there were also really nice looking artistic pieces from those times that I remember). I'll try to find some newer (90's and onward) box arts that I consider a "failed mission in marketing" - this one is a nice example from 2021 --> Saab TF-35 Draken (Skale Wings SS-72001, 1:72), and this one a bit older (2003), but also has a high WTF factor --> Messerschmitt Bf-109E 3/4 "H..tenkrad (Academy 2214, 1:72).
12 October 2024, 14:56

And the next one to your collection, gorby:
Saunders-Roe SR-53 (URSUS , 1:72)
12 October 2024, 19:52

I built that thunderceptor (photo 32) when I was a kid. I got it at a 5 and dime store. I recall I painted it testors metallic gloss red.
12 October 2024, 20:57

Aaaaaand my favourite:
PZL P-23 a Karas (RUCH MK006, 1:72)
PZL P-23a (Coopexim , 1:72)
PZL-23A Karaś (RUCH , 1:72)
PZL P.23A Karaś (PZW , 1:72)
which one do you like most? 😄
Don't you dare look at the contents - what's most unbelievable: the same moulds are used now to produce "new" kits:
PZL P-23B Karas (BIGMODEL K72046, 1:72)
1 12 October 2024, 21:04

Thanks for your comments. Some excellent examples Robert, particularly the first three PZL P.23. 😄
13 October 2024, 07:14

Yes it bugs me when classic box-art is altered to remove any sign of unpleasantness. This is an ideal example.
Superfortress (Airfix 07001-4, 1:72)
Boeing B-29 Superfortress (Airfix A07001, 1:72)
One is full of action and the other is dull.
1 13 October 2024, 13:49

Still, I love the Lindberg's rendering of MiG-19... and Soviet "Warhawk" - quite inspiring, isn't it 😉
13 October 2024, 14:06

The Warhawk is unbelievable! It looks nothing like the real aircraft. I'd love to see the model.
13 October 2024, 15:25

P-40B Tomahawk (Zvezda 7201, 1:72)
You can find out for 15 euro, gorby
1 13 October 2024, 15:48

That Airfix B-29 re-mastered cover art is an affront to the Royal Cross original.
13 October 2024, 16:44

I've just Googled it Ben and it doesn't great, but not as bad as I thought it would. I think I'll save my 15 euro. 😉
I agree Mark (incidentally, the predictive text has change Roy to Royal).
I didn't notice that Martin. 😄
13 October 2024, 17:28

Convair on the picture apparently has no engines, but drop tanks instead 😄 😄 😄t
And here is the next piece of art from Trumpeter:
MiG-15 UTI mixed with Caproni-Stipa by Chinese:
PLA Air Force FT-5 Trainer (Trumpeter 02203, 1:32)
And a few more from Trumpeter:
Chinese Y-5 (Trumpeter 01602, 1:72)
and Airbus Beluga with all-moving tail 😄
A300-600ST Beluga (Trumpeter 00604, 1:144)
and finally, Iliushin Il-28:
Chinese Bomb-5 (Trumpeter 01603, 1:72)
13 October 2024, 19:12

To my previous post, re the B29 box art. It is the inimitable Roy Cross. The reason I bought Airfix. 🤟🥸🤘
13 October 2024, 19:12

Trumpeter have a rich history of dreadful box-art, that Y-5 is particularly painful. 😄
14 October 2024, 06:41

Oh, wow, what a weird looking Voodoo F-101. Hm, I suppose it might be some prototype jet variant.
14 October 2024, 08:26

Very interesting collection of boxart. 👍
There is a reason for the shape of the boxarts made in the Soviet Union. The incompetence of the Soviet industry and the political situation influenced the creation not only of boxarts, but of entire kits produced in the former Soviet Union. Lousy boxarts were defended by claiming that the attractive color pictures on Western boxarts were just capitalist tinsel and bourgeois detailism. And a socialist doesn't need such things.
The model's box was made of poor quality cardboard with mostly two-color printing. From the modest Cyrillic inscription on the box one could read that the box contained a kit of model aircraft number xxxx, or at best, even more accurately, that it was, for example, a fighter aircraft. The instructions for building the model were printed on stiff paper, which could be successfully used as sheet metal. It contained only pictorial instructions for building the model. Any detailed information (colours, camouflage, what kind of machine it was and where it was used...) was missing. In most cases, decals were also missing. In some kits the decals were replaced by stickers. Most of these kits were pressed by the leading company Frog, which was acquired by the Soviets in the second half of the 1970s.
Curiously, the same models, but intended for the Western market, were produced under the NOVO brand. The quality and content of these kits were comparable to the original FROG kits.
14 October 2024, 12:05

Actually, Beaufighter is described here as "morskoj shturmovik" = "sea/navy assault plane"...
14 October 2024, 14:36

I live your comments and the selection (also fron the commentors contributing! Can't wait for the extension of the collection...definitely made my day.
25 December 2024, 11:40

If you are really interested in the topic of amazing boxarts, here is a website created by enthusiasts about models in the USSR Where you will find many more pictures-
retromodels.org
[img1]
[img2]
2 25 December 2024, 13:08

Jan - it was your excellent 'All sorts' album which gave me the idea of posting them on Scalemates, so thanks. 👍
1 26 December 2024, 08:38

Sympa. J'ai eu le Wellington Camojet en provenance directe d'Urss. Merci pour ta visite Gorbie.
1 12 February, 19:17

That Convair 880 is going 6 different directions, all at once. Impressive.
15 February, 19:35

...and so inspiring...more funky box art added by helpful SCM members....
1 16 February, 10:19

Indeed! How the heck I missed this, I don't know. Some real pearls here for sure 👍🤣
1 20 February, 05:38

The Tomahawk looks like it a cross between a Mustang and a Policarpov 🤣
Would have a terrible C.G
But it's good to see nice n innocent basic art work for kids l assume .
1 20 February, 12:04